"A backlink tool says “toxic.” Do not disavow on the label alone"
"Source","https://bluefinchadvisors.com/blog/backlink-toxic-score-disavow-evidence-review"
"Basis","User-entered planning records. Filled fields do not establish completion, approval or compliance."

"Flagged source","Reason label appeared","Direct evidence","Manual-action context","Qualified review decision","Approved action","Missing required fields"
"Illustrative: unfamiliar domain","Vendor risk label","Source context not yet checked","No established manual-action context","Qualified review pending","No automatic disavow","None"

"Use this worksheet"
"The starting row is fictional, not merchant evidence. Replace it with your own verified record. Blank fields remain unresolved."
"Create one row per decision or observation described in the article. Use the worked example to understand the method, not as proof about your business."
"Record exact public URLs and collection dates where relevant. Unknown, failed and not checked are different from a verified pass."
"Keep customer information, account credentials and private documents outside this worksheet. Use role names or internal references."
"A completed row does not prove publication, authorization, indexing, rankings or revenue. Record the actual acceptance check separately."
"Export the record to approved business storage if needed. Browser edits are cleared on reload."

"Sources"
"Google Search Console: when disavow is appropriate","https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2648487?hl=en"
"Google Search Central: spam policies","https://developers.google.com/search/docs/essentials/spam-policies"